Privatization will lead to Less Corruption

Privatization will lead to Less Corruption

Sunday, April 6, 2014 /

Simrandeep said:   

I don't agree that privatization leads to less corruption because private sector only works on price mechanism and is not concerned about public welfare. And due to this they even adopt some malpractices like black marketing, selling low lower quality products on a higher price etc so the only thing that can control corruption is our own effort and resolution to stop and protest against it.



Nishi Jha said:   

First of all I want to say that corruption is due to person's bad mind i.e. to earn money with less effort or freely. Ya there is no doubt government sector is completely corrupted and private sector is less. This is due to the fact that hard rule of private sector and proper watching of workers workS and activity. So after making rule more strict rule and complete watching of worker works and activity we are able to decrease corruption.



Ravi Ranjan said:

I think privatization will help a lot in eradicating corruption because in private sector the main aim of the organization is to make profit, and for this they force their employees to work properly on regular basis, As they want their result fast, it will also help public to get their things done quickly. So their will not be any need to pay for your work to be done on time. This will certainly help in eradicating corruption.



Sheru said:   

Main difference that a private sector will bring to table will be:a transparent system,an efficient scrutinizing mechanism,strict management,less bureaucratic intervention and a constant threat to lose you job if your performance is not upto the expectations.This will reduce corruption.

Lack of transparency,dilution of accountability and job security in public sector sometimes might result in its employee tampering with the system:result corruption.



Anil said:  

As for my point in private sector also do corruption but its more or less compare to public sector and politics. Its not a matter of privatization will control the corruption first we have change people mind set and also Indian law have introduce new system to control the corruption in practical way that should follow everyone.



Shubham Pahwa said: 

I think to a great extent privatization is going to remove corruption but then its not only the solution to it because we are the one who are to form an organization being public or pvt so we have to take initiative for erasing corruption from our mentality then from our society.

"Corruption is not the weed which has developed on its own but a seed brought up by us".

Advertising is a Waste of Resources

Advertising is a Waste of Resources

/

Vinod Siwach said:  

Advertising is communication process to reach the people of every locality and it is helpful for the company but the advertisement should not be done with the celebrity because the product price increase and effect the people of middle as well as lower classes. The common man advertise the product if the quality is good ultimately it demand increase.



Ahsan said:  

Advertising always shows a positive result for a company/organization. It creates an awareness of the existence of the company/organization and consequently more and more people tries to join them which results in a better future of both!



Shruti Gupta said:

According to me advertising is not wastage of money. The main reason behind doing the advertisement is to aware the society about the current market and scenario. What has been change at a particular period of time can be known only through advertisement. For example if any of the disease is being spread in particular locality will be known by the people only through advertisement. Ambhitabh Bacchan has make the aware about the importance about the polio for 0-3 years baby only through advertisement. So it is not a wastage of money.



Bhumika said:    

Good to see so many points from different peoples but then to I will add that ADVERTISEMENT is not a waste, but we all know that excess of anything is bad, by which one can get irritate and get a bad reviews of a product. Advertising is a back bone of launching any product in this generation but much more matters in which mode advertising is going with.

Last not least want to add one more points that advertisement can't hide the quality, yes for a time being but not permanently so the product should always be of good quality.



Shamshad Ah said:  

Hello sir,

Not at all, advertising is promotional tools for each and every companies so because of that they can promote their product into the market and gets benefits out of them. There are some prohibited advertising there and that is not good for consumers. Finally advertising is not waste at all. If any any company wants to promote their product they can easily and consumer will come to know that what are different product available in market and they buys it. In advertisement includes TV, newspaper etc and now a days people utilizes their more time on TV and newspaper so they gets benefits from them and ultimate it goes to companies who invest on advertisement for their products. So at the end advertising is not waste.



Bablu said: 

Hi friends according to me advertisement is not waste of resource because in this competitive world if you are not going to present your product in fabulous way people can't leave the product that they are using already, but it is also a good point that if your product not much effective as you show in advertisement it will completely far from the user after one use then here advertisement is waste of resource. So I want to conclude that if a person really want to stay in market longer time win the heart of customer they must have product that is effective as compare to other so advertisement is not waste of resource is dominating.

Terrorism in India

Terrorism in India

/

Abhishek said:   

Hello friends terrorism is the thing which threatning the world from last several years and threaten India most as I know. Terrorism in India is due to following reason.

1. Illiteracy, poverty, unemployement are the main reason behind the terrorism. Because when a person don't have these things he like to go in terrorism because government don't do anything for these type of persons and in constraint he go in to terrorism.

2. Terrorist kidnapped there family persons and forcely made them terrorist.

3. A major role of government into this also because government don't do any action against terrorist and they are fearless from government like in kasaab's case.

4. When people are not happy with the ploicies of government and government don't do satisfactory works for them then in constraint they become terrorist.



Priya said:

Good noon friends we are discussing about terrorism in my opinion.

1) India is a village. Most of the people are common people. A conman man can do anything for his common needs. These people can work very well under ones guide,

2) young youth who are well educated could not get jobs due to reservation. Poverty line not based on the caste system. The people who are terrorists are not born to become terrorist. They are forced to become because of situation.



Deepak S said:

As we are a developing nation we have no time to loss anything. But the terrorism in our country becomes a threaten to our developing. First we want to know how the terrorism originated. It is an mental statement where they are experienced inequality in the society and they want to make the concentration towards their goal or theme. Mainly when you saw the reasons for terrorism the inequality is the only major thing. Saw a mall attitude from our sides how make a person under pressure and entirely changes his attitude against you to destroy the better example is osama bin laden a american citizen who turn against america itself.



Neeraja said:

Terrorism in India became a major problem. We should fight against it. The main reasons of the terrorism is unemployment, poverty, corruption etc. The government should take care of our country by the terrorists. We should not allow them into our country. The tight security should be held at airports, railway stations, public places.



Shyamala said: 

Hello Friends,

In my point of view.

Terrorism is due to Anger. A person who need something more and not satisfied with his own ability then he became to search something and when he didn't achieve such thing he will become more anger. That anger move him to high pressure. That pressure lead him to violent. And the violent make him to do something ex-ordinary movements. This make a man terrorist and he make a group and join such kind of people with him.

Reservations in the Private Sector

Reservations in the Private Sector

/

Vijay said:

Reservation is something that should should be on the hitlist to abolish in India.There are so many deserving people out there who presently sit unemployed because of this system.Each and every single person should work his/her way up by hard work and not by some unfair advantages granted by a system.

What i feel is that this classification,instead of being made according to one's caste,can be made according to one's economic status,which will give each person what he/she rightfully deserves.



Pawan said:  

Hello friends. I agree with opinions of some of you. Actually reservation in private sector is not necessary, because all (lower and upper class or any category people) has the same brain if they are creative & talented enough then they could be able to join a private company. Govt giving them (to lower class people) scholarship until their education is completed is fair enough now after completing education if they want to join a private firm then its their responsibility or it is on their favor to get it, no reservation is necessary I think so.



Upasana said:   

I am completely against giving reservation on the name of caste in present time. Its good to provide financial help to poor person whatever category to which it belongs. This will give equal chances to everyone but our government see reservation as vote bank policy. They are increasing reservation quota to increase their vote in that caste.

And you know the worst thing is that we are providing reservation in medical stream also. Now just imagine those who got entry in MBBS via reservation and serving in best govt hospitals on basis of it will be able to save the patients.



Himadri Tanaya said:   

"I belong to the backward class yet i completely defy the "job reservation plan". The government ought to recognize the competition for jobs in the market. When such a huge population sits unemployed at home,it is just a shame to discuss about giving priority to low caste.Even, one must know that, today, there is no more violation regarding caste and getting job depends purely on one's potential, personality and of course the tough competition. The government should better focus on helping the poor, irrespective of there caste and stop making such plans which will arouse conflicts."



Nikita Gupta said:  

Reservation is not at all required in the present India. It was meant to raise the status of the SC'S and ST'S etc. but now this facility is misused.

If the basic school education is given to the children of every poor family free of cost not on the basis of caste but on the basis of financial conditions, then there will be no need of reservtaion at higher levels.

If they are primarily educated then they will be at the same status as of the general category and they will be able to compete at the higher levels also.



Kapil Rathore said: 

Reservation is given for the people so that they can grow up at economic and social level in the society. This is an step which is governed by government in our country. Reservation was a good step but now a days it became an path for success.This resulted in continuous degradation in quality of government jobs but there is also a good increment for the government job seekers.

Reservation in private sector will result in same and private sector's main motive is nothing else except money and for that they need quality but reservation may not satisfy the quality they want. So i disagree with the implementation of reservation in private sector.

Educational qualification for Politicians

Educational qualification for Politicians

/

Ashwini J. said:   

Hi friends,

Ya, better if there is a entrance exam for politic people. At-least they have to know some basic educations. Now a days, there are many interview for small children to join a good school, then why can't the political people have interviews and exam to participate in election and to make INDIA great. Because the they are the builder of country, they have to know how to control around 200 crore people. But if they don't know how to control themselves then how can they control whole INDIA.

If they know education, they can take a perfect and stable decisions in any critical problem. So according to me education is mandatory for the political people.



Hemant said:  

Hi all, I am very much satisfied by yours view. Education should be mandatory for all the politician. It should not like that politician should be graduate or post graduate. There should be an exam like as in IAS, PCS. They have to qualify that exam for the election. It will helpful for them to gain more knowledge about our country and the problems which we are facing. So they can work on that.



Amit Kumar Rai said:

Politicians need to know the pulse of the society and the country at large.It is vital for them to ask the right question in parliaments and state legislatures.They must understand the gravity of any problem and the right strategy that should be adopted to mitigate the problem.The areas that need improvement should continuously be monitored.All these demand an analytical and intellectual mind.Though there are bureaucrats to assist the politicians but its always better to have an intellectually sound and an eloquent leader rather than one who is heavily dependent on the bureaucrats.



Simran Sharma said:

According to me, politicians should have at least a minimum of qualification. Although for me, its more about one's interest and focus on politics, rather than holding the first degree in MBA. Their intellect can be measured by their deeds and views in politics!



Marjana Muzammil said:

Hi, friends.

In my opinion education is necessary for a politician to build a strong, rigid base for a country. An educated leader thinks, understands and make his decision perfect. He can make his views and ideas and express it independently.

An educated leader tries to open his eyes, ears to look and hear the problems of his people.

An educated leader knows the value of hardworking and its positive energy.



Aditi Sharan said: 

There is need of minimum educational qualification for the politicians and they should also be screened on the basis of education, moral and social values they hold. Then they should be given administrative training on the background of patriotism. We should think rationally and should not leave our country in the hands of those who are devoid of the qualities required for efficient leadership.

Privatization of Higher Education

Privatization of Higher Education

Friday, April 4, 2014 /

Suman said: 

Privatization is nothing but making our India back because not only rich people but also lower class and middle class families also have intelligent children and they want to study further in good institutions but financial problems create much stress upon them and students get a lot of stress and sometimes it make them so desperate that they think to commit suicide thus who loose the talent, our community, our country.

So I think students must given a chance to prove them.



Amit Bansal said:  

Privatization of Higher Education in India.

Need:
It is definitely one of the crucial topics from yesteryear. The need for privatization finds its way in effective skill development by providing vehicles of several resources. It helps a student to compete in future and perform well. It provides a great deal of amenities in the field of education with demarcated activities. The goal of one gets out of public incarceration through privatization.

Impacts:
The main repercussion we will be able to see is the development of social and cultural perspectives through diversification of the scope of the mind. Private institutions definitely gonna generate a better individual with a firm ambition. Depending upon public sector alone will not grow our country. Role of private functionaries is must for a large democracy.

How to achieve:
In an organization, when there is need to settle for another place, one has to settle with its environment. Going from secondary level in public school to higher level in private college requires a change of mind. Private schools are already made mandated to hire 25% of poor people in their institutions under the well known Right to Education Act. On higher level, several institutions are getting nodes from the education ministry. The government of India should make specific number of institutions to work effectively in the different states.



Vinod Anand said:

I think yes it should & why not. When one can invest to buy a car. When one can take loan to build house then why can't one borrow to get educated after all it will be an income generating asset. Privatization doesn't only mean high fee structure and raising standards of living it also means quality education. In fact we should open the windows and look outside the box we've been living in.



Avinash Rudrakar said:

Hi. Friends this is Avinash Rudrakar: privatization of higher education is good for some areas and also bad. By privatization no doubt the education system quality improves in our country, it helps in growing the nation in faster time but analyzing our Indian economic condition for all public its not easy and no possible to pay the high amount of fees for collages.

The privatization is best way if:.
* the government gives 50% seats to poor students.
* the collage gives some free seats to distinction students.
* the govt. Provides seats as well as more fund to minor students and backward students.
* the collage gives free seats to all students and take the over all fund by govt.



Susmita Dey said:

I think privatisation is not totally harmful. True they are very costly and everyone cannot afford it but in this competitive world people have to have standardized education which the government has far not been able to fulfill to the full extent. So I suggest government and private institutes should come together so that the question of discrimination and affordability should not arise.

 Share your views on this Topic

  

Capital Punishment should be Banned or Allowed?

Capital Punishment should be Banned or Allowed?

/

Dheeraj Kumar said:  

In my opinion instead of banning Capital punishment, frequency of capital punishment should be brought to minimum.

It should be strictly applied in case of Rape & murder (mass murder) because nobody has given him right to destroy somebody's life and they should fear every now and then that this crime will not be tolerate rapist and murderers. But not for robbery or other low level crime because you can earn your wealth again & 10-15 year of imprisonment will give him good lesson.



Sri Krishna said: 

According to me capital punishment should not be banned.

Criminals think that they will be threw into the prison if they commit any crime. There is no mistake in their thinking because the rules of the INDIAN CONSTITUTION had made like that. They don't bother about jail although the punishment time is either 7 years or 14 years because jails are like their vacation spots. (example in the case of kasab). This is one of the reason for increasing in crime rate.

But If India had followed the concept of capital punishment there would be no Mumbai attacks, no murders, no kidnappings. The fear of death (because of capital punishment) should shiver the criminals for thinking of crime. Then India absolutely can be peaceful country.



Sumit Singh said:

Capital punishment should not be abolished rather our government should think about it n emphasize on it. Capital Punishment should be given to those who have done heinous crimes like murder. There must be fear in the mind of people then only we can get healthy atmosphere to live. It will reduce the crime rates in the countries otherwise we will have our newspaper full of crimes in the future as we have now. So to get rid of these things I think Capital punishment should not be abolished.



Sukanta Dhar said:

Hi, 'm Sukanta. I have already written my view here long day back. But I think some people didn't get my point or didn't read my opinion . People like Anuradha, commented on 31st March (plz dont take it in a negative way) , I think are not practical and live in a fantasy ideal world, where (they think) if you forbid a person not to do crime, just listens to you and stop doing crime. Ok. To you all such persons, I am putting few questions again. Please answer straightly, not in a round about way and without repeating idealistic writings like "we should kill....", "then whats the difference between them and the judges" etc. My questions are-
1 ) Tell me just one way to change the minds of people like Kasav, Daud Ibrahim, Afjal Guru and so on or how can you kill the crime within them ?
2 ) How can you be sure enough that they wont do any crime again ?
3 ) How can you be sure that farther no plane will be hijacked demanding their release ?
4 ) Who will bear the cost of super expensive foods and security ( as Kasav is getting right now )?
5 ) Can you think of any other punishment if your father/ mother/brother/sister or your boy friend/ girlfriend / wife/husband will die in such a horrific incident ? If so, then plz mention the punishment you would like to give them .

Thank you.



Suji said:  

Hi I think capital punishment should not be banned. Many of them said that "we should kill crime not criminals", but my point is that "we should kill criminals" automatically crime is not there. So we should give importance to kill the criminals not a crime.

 Share your views on this Topic

Women Empowerment - A Cause for Increasing Divorce Rate in India

Women Empowerment - A Cause for Increasing Divorce Rate in India

/

Deepu Dalal said:

I think women empowerment is not wrong thing. Our country is a democracy country each and everyone have equally rights whatever he or she. Today women participates in every field i.e. sports, social work, politics, defence, finance etc. They show there capability, skill to develop the country. Some women take the advantages of there right & misuse the empowerment. Divorce comes by the misunderstanding bewteen men and women. Some people think that women are only for housewife this is the wrong thong.



Nikita said:   

Women empowerment leads to divorces in least cases. Mostly women make a family happy. Without them a family can not run systematically. She is the one who understands everyone's needs and does her best to fulfill them. In most cases men are the ones who are responsible for divorces. They tend to misunderstand every aspect of a awoman's behaviour and take it in a different way.

It rarely happens that a woman turns out to be a whamp and wants to destroy the family.



Victor said:   

Gentlemen the main cause of divorse in our society is definately not the women empowerment. Yes in some cases we can take because women empowerment brought financial independence for women in our society as well as ego problems to husband and wife both and that ego is leading to divorce. But the main reasons behind the divorce are as under ;

1. women empowerment changed the equations of our society and brought misunderstanding between couples and lack of interaction because of lack of time multiplied it. and finnaly misnderstanding concluding to divorce.

2. nuclear family fashion is also a root cause as earlier if hus and wife were having some problem there were enough oldies to solve that but no one now a days.

3. western life style and lack of moral and values and sense of responsibilities leading towards.

4. passion for glamours and high profile life style.

5. social evils like dowry.



Abhishek Chaudhary said:  

Hello,

According to me, there is no relation between women's empowerment and divorce cases as,

WOMAN EMPOWERMENT means providing women equal rights in the society as of men, providing woman to move hand to hand with man, it means that the women of the nation be given equal respect and equal rights when it comes to their financial development, Job Security etc.

Whereas,

DIVORCE take place due to the lack of mutual understanding between husband and wife. The man always has domineering nature and the main problem is with egoism, when a woman start earning equal or sometimes more than a husband and start taking some decisions by her own, it hurts man egoism an he feel jealous of it. And at the same time woman think after doing all the household works and contributing financially, why she should be humiliated on the contrary she must get respect for that. But when man unable to feel her feelings it results into the lacking of fruit fullness in their relations and they decide for DIVORCE, bloody divorce".



Santhoshi said:

In my view, I don't think that women empowerment cause to divorce because now-a-days most of the women are working, only some of them are taking divorce. The main reason is that the old people (parents of men or women) are living in orphanage so that, if any misunderstanding is done between men and women they can't be stopped.

The person who is working, think that "after coming to home, there should be a person to take care of them". But in these days both wife and husband are going to office. So, there is no time to understand and share feelings of each other.

Certainly there will be ego to the women when she is working because she thinks that she is also earning money, but this attitude comes to the women after seeing the authority of the men in home.

So, women empowerment doesn't cause in increase of divorce rate in India.

 Share your views on this Topic